Skip navigation

CMCC

Historical Review: CMCC’s persistent pursuit of university affiliation Part II: knocking on doors and heads in Ontario 1969 to 1988

July 14, 2014

The Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC) or its agents, have been seeking some form of university affiliation for at least 30 years, yet to date those efforts have been fruitless. It has been said that one’s success is not measured by the position you have attained – but by the obstacles you have had to

Read More

Historical Review CMCC’s persistent pursuit of university affiliation Part III: the push for union with the University of Victoria, BC, 1988 to 1992

July 09, 2014

The period between 1988 and 1992 is reviewed with respect to the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC) and its attempted affiliation with the University of Victoria in British Columbia. Part I, published earlier, detailed the period between 1945 and 1969 and the proposals for university affiliation with the University of Alberta and Brandon College in

Read More

Restructuring of the jurisprudence course taught at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

June 13, 2014

Introduction: The process by which the jurisprudence course was restructured at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College is chronicled. Method: A Delphi process used to restructure the course is described, and the results of a student satisfaction survey are presented. Results: When asked “I think this material was clinically relevant,” over 81% of the 76 students

Read More

Attitudes of clinicians at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College towards the chiropractic management of non-musculoskeletal conditions

June 06, 2014

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the attitudes of clinical faculty during the 2009–2010 academic year at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College towards the treatment of various nonmusculoskeletal disorders. Methods: A confidential survey was distributed to the clinical faculty via email. It consisted of several questions polling the demographic of the respondent

Read More

back to top